This variety is not unlike the museum campus itself (there’s a lot of different things that you can do here, and seemingly something new every day). Okay, now that really is being a homer, but it’s true, or at least it is for me — and maybe this is because I work here and I have a sense of all the things that are currently in the works.

It’s interesting that no one has said that they don’t like the format….

Adding a way to more quickly choose particular content would be useful.

What else, hmm… how about more coffee and chocolate for the conservation blogger. That sounds pretty good. Can you make that happen, Despi?

…I see there is a category list on the “archives” page–I’d consider promoting that to the main page and giving each category its own feed.

Just 2 cents–I’ll keep subscribing to the whole enchilada. Great work–

I think we are usually a bit cautious in reporting arts events outside of IMA, since there are other locals for whom that role is more central to their mission. That being said, many of us that work at IMA are also consumers of the local arts scene and it stands to reason that what happens outside of IMA’s walls certainly affects our work.

And I think Noelle is right in that we are still sorting things out. To that end we have been talking about how to offer more in-depth content for those who want it. Which led us to the discussion of categories.

I appreciate Best of 3′s comments about a the benefits of an unexpected find. It is reassuring to know that there is a regular reader out there who feels this way about our content! And thank you for being a regular reader!!

Please keep the ideas coming!

Personally, I really like serendipity in my reading – to read a post on a topic that I wouldn’t have thought I was interested in, and get to the end and think ‘wow, I really enjoyed that’. That’s why I’d encourage you to keep mixing posts up, not sift them into categories.