<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Gift to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imamuseum.org/blog/2008/12/25/our-gift-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imamuseum.org/blog/2008/12/25/our-gift-to-you/</link>
	<description>The IMA blog is a space to discuss everything related to the Indianapolis Museum of Art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: art fenski</title>
		<link>http://www.imamuseum.org/blog/2008/12/25/our-gift-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-23407</link>
		<dc:creator>art fenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imamuseum.org/blog/?p=2212#comment-23407</guid>
		<description>waz visitin th new &quot;design gallery.&quot;  uhhh...interstin ? can somebody explain - with a straight face - how a pink penis-and-testicle-shaped vase is &quot;art?&quot;  how much $ did that set y&#039;all back?  if i saw it in a feminist context as excoriating male chauvinism, i&#039;d understand, but as &quot;best of european design?&quot;  makes me think of the old Bloom County cartoon where, in response to &quot;think about just what makes your little life worthwhile&quot; the character looks down into his underwear.     does the IMA really want to make contemporary art n design look sooo frivolous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waz visitin th new &#8220;design gallery.&#8221;  uhhh&#8230;interstin ? can somebody explain &#8211; with a straight face &#8211; how a pink penis-and-testicle-shaped vase is &#8220;art?&#8221;  how much $ did that set y&#8217;all back?  if i saw it in a feminist context as excoriating male chauvinism, i&#8217;d understand, but as &#8220;best of european design?&#8221;  makes me think of the old Bloom County cartoon where, in response to &#8220;think about just what makes your little life worthwhile&#8221; the character looks down into his underwear.     does the IMA really want to make contemporary art n design look sooo frivolous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
