Back to imamuseum.org

Design Arts Collection: M&Co.

Jim Sholly is a member of the Design Arts Society at the IMA. He kicks off a series of blog posts on acquisitions for the IMA's new Design Arts galleries, opening in fall of 2013.

Being a graphic design student in the 1980s could be a confusing thing.  In one philosophical corner, the well-rooted tenets of Modernism and its zealots were holding fast to their rules of white space and Swiss precision. In the other, undisciplined agitators freed by punk rock, personal computing and a DIY ethic, were making inroads into the mainstream. Somewhere — leading from the middle — was Tibor Kalman (1949-1999).

M&Co., the firm Kalman began in his Greenwich Village apartment in 1979, was a seemingly conventional design agency with clients in real estate, publishing, fashion, and music. But it was also a venue for Kalman and his band of like-minded provocateurs to rattle the status quo whenever opportunity knocked.

Kalman’s own work was rooted in traditional graphic design — he began as a self-taught, in-house designer for the store that became Barnes & Noble. Perhaps motivated by a need to make a difference or challenge conventions (most likely both), he began pushing the boundaries of what the profession would allow. His work raided the lowest brow vernacular to promote the most upscale New York restaurants. He famously altered the ethnicity of Queen Elizabeth and portrayed Ronald Reagan as an AIDS victim in the pages of Colors magazine. In a notorious 1990 essay in Print magazine, he encouraged graphic designers to “stop being the lap dogs of big business . . . We’re here to make them think about design that’s dangerous and unpredictable. We’re here to inject art into commerce. We’re here to be bad.”

M&Co. never let the fact that they were graphic designers limit what they were capable of producing. They were as adept with music videos and film titles as they were with the printed page. Product design was an unexpected area in which they excelled. Many of the wryly conceptual accessories they created (Kalman called it “yuppie porn”), are now considered classics of the era. A paperweight that looked like a crumpled piece of paper, a black umbrella with a cheerful blue sky on the inside — clever commentaries on our expectations for what these everyday products should be.

After a 1983 venture with the Japanese company Sointu soured, Kalman formed an alliance with a Swiss manufacturer and began the production of the first watches under the M&Co. label. Traditional in appearance, the early designs evolved from straightforward timepieces into a collection of concepts that playfully poked holes in our familiarity with the measurement of time. One design altered the customary positions of the numbers into a new composition. It was momentarily jarring, until you realized that you really didn’t need those cumbersome numbers anyway. No numbers, blurred numbers, scribbles, multiple hands, stubby hands — all upended conventions of traditional watch design that M&Co. (sometimes literally) turned on their side. Churning out dozens of designs within the period of a few years, M&Co. embodied the motto imprinted on the back side of each watch: Waste Not a Moment.

A standout in the collection was the 10-ONE-4 design.

TR11522-2-d01

Although its origin has been disputed, it is generally accepted that the concept for this design came from the sketchbook of famed author/illustrator Maira Kalman (who happened to be Tibor’s wife). A stunning example of reductionism put into practice, the black and white face of this watch eliminates most of the numbers and leaves the seemingly random 10, 1 and 4 to accomplish the job. The minimalist elegance of the design is enhanced by the use of the classic thick/thin typeface Bodoni — a major consideration given the few visible design elements. Typically presented with a black bezel and black leather band, this watch transcends the trends of the 1980s and remains a timeless piece of timekeeping hardware.

Already at home in the Museum of Modern Art, the 10-ONE-4 watch (which Kalman dubbed “ironic modernism”) now takes its place as a stunning piece of graphic-cum-product design in the IMA’s burgeoning design collection.

Filed under: Design, The Collection

 

ArtBabble: Behind the Design

Last Tuesday, we launched a brand new website for ArtBabble.  Rita Troyer, Digital Graphic Designer in IMA Lab, discusses the design process:

The Brand

Since its launch in April 2009, ArtBabble has grown into something far greater than the original website it began as. It seemed only fitting to give the site and its visual identity a facelift given the ever growing nature of its content and partner reach.

In early July of this year, fellow IMA Lab designer, Matt Gipson and I set out to create several rebrand directions. After a few brainstorming sessions with take aways like “simpler,” “sleeker,” and “more vibrant,” the rebrand process was underway. We first nailed down our designs to two different directions and shortly thereafter, came up with our final approach.

Old logo on the left; Redesign on the right.

The new ArtBabble mark focuses on two things: streamlining and refining the brand, while maintaining elements of the original. ArtBabble’s purpose is to enable free flowing conversation, about art, for anyone. The new brand retains the play button, uses the eye catching Babble blue, and maintains the rounded typography, but with a matured feel. The color palette incorporates brighter, more vibrant colors, and with ArtBabble having just celebrated its third birthday, we felt that it was time to ditch the “Play Art Loud” tagline.

The Website

From the start of the website redesign process, the main goal was to come up with a design that had room to grow.  We wanted to plan for the site to evolve in the same capacity that it had over the past three years. Another goal was to design partner pages, artist pages, etc. so they could stand-alone. For some institutions, their ArtBabble Channel may be their main hub for video content. Therefore, their Partner Channel needed to work as a page that could be linked to directly as an outlet for their content. You’ll also notice that the redesign brings more of a visual presence to the videos and allows users to either dive into the material they are seeking, or browse casually. The new site structure brings ArtBabble’s amazing content to the forefront of a user’s experience.

Final homepage mockup

Mobile navigation mockup

Not only has the content of the site evolved over time, technology has evolved as well. The new, responsive design provides an optimal viewing experience for users no matter what device they’re on. Take a look here. Videos now play through players that are HTML5 compatible, making the video content accessible on desktops, tablets and mobile devices. The new ArtBabble is all about making content accessible wherever our audiences may be, on whatever device they may be using.

We couldn’t be more pleased with the way ArtBabble has grown since its launch in 2009.  We hope you enjoy the new logo and website redesign! Feel free to share your thoughts below.

Filed under: Design, New Media, Technology

 

ArtBabble: Back and Bigger than Ever

Today is the big day – the day we relaunch ArtBabble to the world. After six months of surveying, planning and designing and one wild 24 hour #babblesprint, I couldn’t be happier to share the fruits of our labor with our loyal followers. I hope you love the changes as much as we do.

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: Art, Design, Education, New Media

 

Peeking into the Miller House and Garden Collection

Among the many holdings of the IMA’s Archives is the Miller House and Garden Collection, the records documenting the design, construction, and maintenance of the Miller House and Garden in Columbus, Indiana. We’re happy to announce that you can have a peek at some of these materials online as we digitize the collection, thanks to a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH).

The importance of the Miller House and Garden to Modern design in the United States is clear: the house, named a National Historic Landmark in 2000, has been described as a paragon of mid-century modern residential design and its garden is considered to be among the most important Modern designs in American residential landscape architecture. And just as the Miller House and Garden is not your average residence, the Miller House and Garden Collection (MHGC) is not your average architectural archive.

What distinguishes the MHGC from other architectural collections? That’s easy. Size, multiple perspectives, time span, and types of materials.

How Big is Big?

For a collection about one house, the Miller House and Garden Collection is big. Very big.

View of Miller House and Garden Collection boxes.

Archival collections are often described in linear feet, but describing this collection as 333.5 linear feet means little to most people. Nor is it easy to picture 23,000 records. To break it down by other numbers – 51 boxes of files, photographs, samples, and drawings; 2 card file boxes; 12 oversize flat boxes of photographs and material samples; and 40 flat files of architectural plans – may provide a slightly better picture. As may analogies like this: if the records were laid out end to end they could lap the Indianapolis Motor Speedway twice or stretch the length a football field 88 times!

But what makes it so big is less about its physical size and more about its content – 50+ years of documentation representing hundreds of voices.

The Clients, the Architects, the Landscape Architect, the Contractor

A remarkable feature of the MHGC is the number of voices you hear: the clients, the architects, the landscape architect, contractor, suppliers, and engineers. Generally architectural collections present just the perspective of the architect. Sometimes papers from the client survive. Yet not in a single collection.

Correspondence in the Miller House and Garden Collection.

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: Design, Miller House

 

Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes

I know what you’re thinking. This guy still works there? It has been a while since I’ve written a blog post. Nearly three years or so. I’m still here. Been busy. REALLY busy. Anyone who has visited the museum in the past few years has seen the changes being made to the campus. It seems like nearly everything has gone through some type of transformation. Some of it is still in the works. In the six years that I have worked here, the changes the museum has been through have been so numerous that its easy to forget everything I’ve worked on. Think about it: new logo, 100 Acres, Miller House, The Toby, revamped Cafe, Design Center, magazine redesign. …and those were just some of the bigger projects. Now try and remember all of the exhibitions we’ve shown. Between the major traveling exhibitions and our own permanent collection rotations, it was a lot.

In the Marketing offices

In 2006, the graphic design team worked in the marketing department. Exhibition design worked on the other side of the building. There wasn’t usually much crossover. The brochure you picked up was never part of the dialogue with actual exhibition design. We handled primarily marketing print work. No exhibition graphics. Since then, all of that has changed. Graphic design is part of the larger Design Studio. We collaborate every day, not only with each other, but with every other department in the museum. We still work on all print collateral, but also on exhibition graphics. We’ve had our growing pains, but it has been an amazing experience that has helped strengthen not only my own work, but the overall design of the museum and the visitor experience.

The Design Studio

So, what’s the point of all this? Tomorrow night, Wednesday February 15th, David Russick, our Chief Designer, and I will be giving a presentation for AIGA Indy about how our department functions here at the museum. It has been a crazy trip for us as we’ve looked back at all of the things we’ve worked on. Our accomplishments and our failures. Over coffee, we’ve remembered many of the amazing and ridiculous things that have happened with each project. We’d love to have you come out to the Indianapolis Art Center and learn about design at the IMA and help support AIGA. More info can be found here. Hopefully we’ll see you there. Oh, and I’ll try not to wait three years between blog posts next time.

Filed under: Design, IMA Staff, Local

 

Recent Flickrs

Ai Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening ReceptionAi Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening ReceptionAi Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening ReceptionAi Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening ReceptionAi Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening ReceptionAi Weiwei: According to What? Talk and Opening Reception